People¶
Org structure, roles, and the people lifecycle. System of record is Employment Hero for employee/leave data; ops-hub's role model (below) governs system access, not employment terms.
Org chart by accountability¶
TODO: Lumaris is principal-led and deliberately small (per the ISMS scope statement — this concentrates access and key-person risk, which the firm is already aware of). A confirmed org chart wasn't found in the material reviewed; check Shared drives/2. Business Administration/1. Roles and Responsibilities/Lumaris_Business_Operating_Framework_v0.3.docx (a draft business operating framework already exists there) and reconcile it with this file rather than maintaining two versions.
Once confirmed, structure it by accountability, not hierarchy — who owns each function's outcome, not just who reports to whom:
Principal(s)
├── Strategy & client relationships — accountable: [name/role]
├── Delivery — accountable: [name/role]
├── Sales & business development — accountable: [name/role]
├── Finance & operations — accountable: [name/role]
└── People — accountable: [name/role]
System access roles (ops-hub)¶
These are distinct from job titles — they govern what someone can see in the internal dashboard.
| Role | Access |
|---|---|
director |
Full access — all views, day rates, margins, P&L. Manages other users' roles. |
operations |
Full access except day rates. Can export data. |
delivery_lead |
Pipeline, all projects, capacity calendar. Revenue visible; margins and day rates hidden. |
consultant |
Own projects and time logs only. No pipeline or finance access. |
pending |
Authenticated, no access yet — a director must assign a role. |
Onboarding¶
TODO: no confirmed onboarding checklist found — draft one with input from whoever last onboarded a consultant or subcontractor. At minimum it should cover:
- [ ] Employment Hero record created
- [ ] Google Workspace (@lumarisco.com.au) account provisioned
- [ ] ops-hub access requested → director assigns role
- [ ] Rate card role assigned (for day-rate/margin calculations)
- [ ] Security onboarding — see ISMS documentation (Google Drive) for access control and acceptable-use requirements
- [ ] Introduced to current engagements they'll be staffed on
Offboarding¶
TODO: mirror of onboarding — access revocation (Google Workspace, ops-hub, HubSpot/Xero if applicable), asset return, knowledge handoff for any active engagements. Given the firm's key-person-risk profile noted in the ISMS scope, offboarding for anyone holding privileged system access should be treated as higher-risk and reviewed by a principal.
Related¶
- functions/operations — where ISMS/security policy lives
- functions/delivery — utilisation and allocation